On Friday, the legislators of the class discussed the pros and cons of our labeling situation.
For those who were averse to labeling, their main support was that no negative affects have been detected. There is also the fact that consumers who prefer non-GE foods already have the option of buying authentic organic foods, which would make labeling seem pointless. Furthermore, there could be severe effects on the economy and trade system, because of the technical issues that must be resolved before a law is passed.
For those who were keen on labeling, their main support was that the public has a right to know exactly what they are buying and eating. (especially those with allergies or religious/ethical beliefs) Health and environmental concerns have been raised to wether these products could harm people or the earth; but as our anti-labeling representatives so clearly pointed out, no significant differences have been found.
We still came to conclusion that, yes, GE foods should be labeled, mainly for the safety, rights and beliefs of the consumers.
No comments:
Post a Comment